By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tbone51 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
generic-user-1 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

On the contrary, it would be another nail in the coffin of the Nintendo's only competitor further continuing its life long monopoly on the handheld market. Cause fuck competition.

The thing is, why would Atlus/Sega care? They dont work for Nin/Sony. They're profits come from software. Its the same argument with MH. People in the past (some to this day lol) that Capcom f***ed over Vita by not releasing a new MH on the system (practically to increase vita sales by a huge margin). Last i checked Capcom doesn't get a cent on Vita sales, why would they care?

Just sayin

See this is why I "quoted" your post.

You claimed a multiplat would be "good for everyone", but in reality it is only good for Nintendo. Competition be damned.

Hence the market has been owned by Nintendo since forever, and the only source of new handheld technology that has impact is mobile.

Nobody mentioned whether or not Atlus would care, and 3rd parties, especially Japanese ones routinely screw over Sony because they basically do nothing for them or against them. Granted Nintendo, is practically as inactive as Sony in that regard but because of Nintendo's HH brand they can literally get away with anything.

I find it ironic that competition is encouraged where Nintendo is losing but a Monopoly is fine were Nintendo is basically unopposed.

And I can't help but laugh when some one makes a thread about Anti-Nintendo Bias.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank