the right to bear arms and how it can be used to defend from big government

[Mr Khan]

pokoko said:
The guns could have turned it into something worse. The exposure is what saved the day.

However, I'm not sure I understand this. He's using land he doesn't own in order to make money but refuses to pay anything? While others do pay? I see no reason why I should be on this guy's side.

Exactly. Guy wants to have his cake and eat it too.

(goes without saying that i won't respond to the lunacy of right-wing power trippers thinking that gun ownership does anything substantive to stop the State).