pokoko said: The guns could have turned it into something worse. The exposure is what saved the day. However, I'm not sure I understand this. He's using land he doesn't own in order to make money but refuses to pay anything? While others do pay? I see no reason why I should be on this guy's side. |
The guns allowed their voices to be heard. had they not been armed, they would all be in jail right now and there would not have been time for a fuss to happen. he was able to defend himslef becuase he was armed
badgenome said it better, but its more of a state vs fed thing. the feds should not own that land, its state land, and Bundy should be dealing with state authorities over it, not the BLM a federal agency. Over the years the feds have used many "systems" to take state rights aways, and it isnt right.
Edit: I'll add that I dont think this mans problems are over. I would not be suprised to now see him scrutinized by the IRS or other federal agencies. we will see