By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
The guns could have turned it into something worse. The exposure is what saved the day.

However, I'm not sure I understand this. He's using land he doesn't own in order to make money but refuses to pay anything? While others do pay? I see no reason why I should be on this guy's side.


The guns allowed their voices to be heard. had they not been armed, they would all be in jail right now and there would not have been time for a fuss to happen. he was able to defend himslef becuase he was armed

 

badgenome said it better, but its more of a state vs fed thing. the feds should not own that land, its state land, and Bundy should be dealing with state authorities over it, not the BLM a federal agency. Over the years the feds have used many "systems" to take state rights aways, and it isnt right.

 

Edit: I'll add that I dont think this mans problems are over. I would not be suprised to now see him scrutinized by the IRS or other federal agencies. we will see