By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
DonFerrari said:
He provided you the source PD page have total sales, vgchartz page have physical estimative. For GT5 they are close, for Gt5p and Gtpsp vgchartz
Is Almost 30% under PD page, and this is assumed due to digital. If you can't enter PD page, check vgchartz numbers I'm not sure you have intracromossomial capacity to discuss teu matter. And by seeing your thread, replies and intention I believe this is the case, even more when you can't infer this much by the available data.

You know what they say about assuming.....Also by that logic you could assume all other games that are undertracked on VG charts are due to digital sales??? No you could not. He never provided any evidence whatsoever to back up his claims. I was able to find EA (who's information is more credible than any of us, even if they are pricks) stating we are far away from even reaching 30% digital. This would not have been stated if digital sales were representing 15-20% by this point.  Considering the terrible spelling you would think you are related to Mr.Elite or an alt account!

So you will consider 30% divergence for gt5p or Gtpsp but not for gt6 even if the others had a lot of time for correction. And still complain about changing arguments. I'm no one alt not know elite. About assuming, because EA posted that a long time ago them all struggle the same? I should think you are mr. Puggsly or selnor alt by your attitude towards gt? By your logic it seems so.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."