walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
think-man said:
Yeah but you said "still has dat Titanfall" and I'm saying don't need a xbone for it so its not really an advantage to me. Making it relevant to your post, and thus relevant to this thread.
|
Still an advantage for Xbox One over the PS4, which is what this thread is about.
I mean, if you're harping on PC, where is your response to the OP where most of what he gave to PS4 could actually go to PC?
|
Its only an advantage for the first two years. Titanfall is coming to the PS4 after the first one amasses its profit. Microsoft just wants Titanfalls name to be associated to it so they are just spending massive amounts of marketing dollars to make people believe thats the case right now.
|
Sounds like a long winded way of saying advantage: Xbone.
|
It is an advantage, but Sony has plenty of other exclusives happening.
|
Yes, I agree. But exclusive doesn't mean good or excellent. Yes, there were great exclusives in the past and I am not doubting the hype for ND will get lower with PS4 but really, just being an exclusive doesn't tell you anything about quality.
|
True, but when people judge first party quality from both guess who 9/10 wins out? Not subjectively speaking. Sony has a much high list of high rated exclusives and yes the exclusive list is higher which causes a more varied fail/success rate. Microsofts most successful games are either Forza, Halo, Fable and then someone elses games. Being that Sony has the advantage in sales now the sales will be higher this gen than last gen for sure on exclusives. Microsofts exclusives will sell well as well but Sonys will experience a boost. Hell Killzone even sold very well compared to the other launch titles. Killzone and Rising were both the top two AAA launch titles. Killer Instinct wasnt AAA but its a big game for me so i'll try to keep my bias out of it.
