Actually it is literally 100 times more impressive thn Muramasa in just about every possible technical aspect. Polygons, animations, lighting, textures, shaders, literally everything. Your bias is extremly strong in this one.
Graphics are strictily about visual technical aspects of the game. What you are referring to are aesthetics, which are subjective, pointless to debate about, and are not what this thread is about.
Wrong...graphics to me has always been about how visually pleasing a game looks. It involves both technical and aesthetics and therefore graphics as a whole is subjective, and pointless to debate about!!! This thread is about how Nintendo fans should not care about the technical aspects(specs) of how a game's graphics came to fruition but instead look at the whole picture!!! Nintendo fans should just enjoy the visuals the Wii U and 3DS are able to produce as they are able to have beautiful HD graphics now (regardless of type of shadows, negligible amt of aliasing, polys, as the whole picture matters). With this final post I have on this site I will post some Wii U games that I think (and hopefully many console fans think as well if they let their bias go) look good regardless if Wii U had the specs of a Dreamcast or whatever. I don't care how they got it just as long as they got it!!! I am glad to see that more than 90% of the over 200 polled are with me in terms of games mean more than any specs console have!!! To all the gamers out there I hope you enjoy all the beautiful games your Wii U, X1, PS4 has to offer and stop worshipping their specs.