Emily Rogers: “Wii U Owners Better Buy Ubisoft Games”

[oniyide]

DevilRising said:

oniyide said:

DevilRising said:

 

A) Wii U is 100% compatible with the Wii Mote.

B) With the Wiimote being the primary controller for Wii, that console got just about ZERO of Ubisofts big games like Assassin's Creed, etc.

C) Just...............*sigh*

Just Dance isnt a big game? what about Prince of Persia

I'm sorry, but no.

Wii got a shitty port of PoP 3 with waggle tacked on. It did not get a port of the (very solid) 2008 PoP game. It also got a sub-par port of "Forgotten Sands". Just Dance is a high selling franchise. That does not, however, imply that it has any value to acual gamers. I was clearly talking about Ubi's big franchises that have made them the force they are right now, especially among the uber-pre-ordering "hardcore" gamers.

They deserve credit for publishing the Red Steel and No More Heroes games on Wii. They did also put Rayman Origins on Wii. But when it came to their bigger "hardcore" franchises like Rainbow Six: Vegas, Far Cry 2, Assasin's Creed, etc., Wii missed the boat. That's what I was saying. Having the Wiimote go back to being hte primary controller isn't going to "Fix" anything at this point. The system getting games, and people actually buying them is.

really because according to most here they would swear that the WIi got the best version of Forgotten Sands. Did YOU just not like it? are the reviews wrong? Are wii fans talking out their ass? Im asking cause i dont know. Im not a fan of the series. Oh how times have changed i remember when WIi fans would tout Just Dance around as one of the big franchises, but its not no more? (obviously i understand that not ALL Wii owners think the same and i dont even think you ever made that argument, just find it interesting how things change) I would watch the "value to actual gamers" comment not because i dont agree, cause i do but people get sensitive about that. 

I agree with the 2nd paragraph