By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JoeTheBro said:
osed125 said:
JoeTheBro said:

From your signature I've figured out you're a Nintendo fanboy. No wonder you're so opposed to this device and the scattered love it's receiving.

LOL. See how that train of thought is beyond stupid?

I'm not a fanboy, I like Nintendo, that's pretty much it. 

But tell me, why would Sony fans like this new device when they apparently can't play half of the Vita's library? No matter how much of a fan you are, there's no reason to buy one if you can't play those games. Also, most people complaints (including Sony fans) were the memory cards and those are still present. Why are they still happy about it now? 

I guess most people who said they liked it and only watched the video and didn't see the other news about it. 

Because we aren't buying it just to play Vita games... Heck the feature that most people seem to care about is remote play.

As far as memory cards go, it has 1GB of internal memory meaning you only need to buy a memory card if you want digital games, unlike the current Vita.

Also,

PS Vita TV will also support “nasne™,” a networked recorder and media storage device . Users will not only be able to enjoy content stored within the device but also back up their game data as well as save data on “nasne™” via the network.

I guess most people who said they didn't like it only watched the video and didn't see the other news about it.

Also my fanboy comment went over your head. You're judging people in this thread with Sony signatures as liking it for fanboy reasons, so I applied the same logic to you.

What's the point then? Why even call it a Vita if you aren't going to buy it for the games? Again, further proof that Sony doesn't know what to do with the thing other than making it a PS4 accessory, which imo, won't save the device.

As for the memory, then my apologies, didn't saw that bit of news.



Nintendo and PC gamer