By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
A203D said:
RenCutypoison said:
A203D said:

Exactly, if its not sexual objectification, then explain to me why Hope dosen't have 80 skin revealing clothes in sexually provactive positions?

Why dosen't FF10-2 feature 3 male characters wearing next to nothing?

I'm not saying that I care if thats what Square Enix are doing. But these outfits have nothing to do with 'personality'. This is sexual objectification nothing more. If thats what you want then thats nothing to do with me. But don't tell me this is all about deep character building. Its Playboy fanservice, nothing more.

It's about making pretty characters.

Are you saying a girl that wear a miniskirt is an object ?

Cause peach is weel dressed and everything, but is there only to be princessnapped and so mario can save her.

It's not about the outfit, it's about their place in the story.

Then explain something to me:

How does increasing Lightning's cup size and giving her over 80 sexually provactive costumes 'improve the story'??

I'm not saying a girl that wears a miniskirt is an object... I'm saying that Kitase and Toriyama increasing Lightning's cup size and giving her sexually revealing cosutmes are sexually objectification, nothing more.

I'm not saying theres anything wrong or right with it. I am saying this is nothing to do with the story, or developing Lightning's personality. This is Playboy fanservice for the purpose of selling more copies.

So it's fanservice. How is it bad for fans ?