By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AnthonyW86 said:

I saw this article and i found the idea pretty interesting: http://www.explosion.com/30989/why-the-wii-u-is-destined-to-become-the-next-sega-dreamcast/?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_57717

I think some important points where missed though. For one Nintendo's first party line-up is much stronger than Sega's was, and so is Nintendo's financial position.

Really? Virtua Fighter 3, Crazy Taxi, Sonic Adventure, House of The Dead, Soul Calibur (OK not first party but exclusive)...few others too

However the Dreamcast final blow was piracy

Debateable, there's not evidence to support that claim at all.

and recent rumours suggest that the Wii-U has already been hacked.

It hasn't been hacked, you will need a £100/$150 device to for the device that emulates the optical drive, that's not hacked, that's a middle man attack that it possible on any console.

Also Nintendo barely makes an profit on the Wii-U system itself if any, a situation very different to that of the Wii and other Nintendo home consoles.

Even that's not proven.

Wii-U even if it would fail would not force NIntendo out of the hardware market, but could we be looking back on the Wii-U 5 years from now as we do on the Dreamcast?

It could be even worse than the Dreamcast, or better we don't know. But the reason the Dreamcast failed is purely because potential buyers had lost confidence in Sega after abandoning the 32x and the Saturn and also that most games for the Dreamcast were arcade (mostly perfect because of hardware being based on a cutdown Naomi board) ports.

I don't see any similarity between the Dreamcast situation and the Wii-U situation, except they both sold like shit overall and even the Dreamcast did pretty good numbers to begin with so I'd dispute the article and your comments completely as there being no link whatsoever.

Interested if you have any counter points though?