By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ethomaz said:
walsufnir said:
Obviously the cores have power-management-features but I can't really look up the abbreviations.
Ethomaz, is this a machine you have access on? Is the listing from cpuinfo from you? Because if it is I can tell you other commands ;) The difference-picture regarding bobcat and jaguar is not revealing anything groundbreaking - higher clock, more cache, enhanced isa -> standard cpu-evolution.
The benchmarks are strange somehow - why did you choose exactly these for comparison? :) And the site is awful to me to look at but ok, they want to show as much as possible in a small format.
Ah, found things about the clock:
CPU scaling governor
CPU0: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz
CPU1: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz
CPU2: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz
CPU3: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz
And according to the cpuinfo-info it can do these in 100mhz-steps, nice.
Overall at least you should have explained what the benchmark-table shows (means: what is tested exactly) because at first look they can mean anything ;)

No, these are not mine... the site have the specs and info: https://www.osadl.org/Profile-of-system-in-rack-9-slot-1.qa-profile-r9s1.0.html

I found the site hard to understand too so I tried to make a compilation with one of each Arch with similar number of core and clock. I need to study these results to see if they are applied to real compute tasks or for games.

Ok looking forward to your investigations but please try to get info about what compilers where used and which processor-flags as these factors can change results quite a bit.