ethomaz on 23 April 2013
| walsufnir said: Obviously the cores have power-management-features but I can't really look up the abbreviations. Ethomaz, is this a machine you have access on? Is the listing from cpuinfo from you? Because if it is I can tell you other commands ;) The difference-picture regarding bobcat and jaguar is not revealing anything groundbreaking - higher clock, more cache, enhanced isa -> standard cpu-evolution. The benchmarks are strange somehow - why did you choose exactly these for comparison? :) And the site is awful to me to look at but ok, they want to show as much as possible in a small format. Ah, found things about the clock: CPU scaling governor CPU0: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz CPU1: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz CPU2: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz CPU3: ondemand from 800 to 2000 MHz And according to the cpuinfo-info it can do these in 100mhz-steps, nice. Overall at least you should have explained what the benchmark-table shows (means: what is tested exactly) because at first look they can mean anything ;) |
No, these are not mine... the site have the specs and info: https://www.osadl.org/Profile-of-system-in-rack-9-slot-1.qa-profile-r9s1.0.html
I found the site hard to understand too so I tried to make a compilation with one of each Arch with similar number of core and clock. I need to study these results to see if they are applied to real compute tasks or for games.
