Player1x3 said:
And seems like you have a spelling problem. See, cheapshots won't get us anywhere This amount of RAM has never been added to a successor console before and that's a FACT NES to SNES seems like a big jump only because of how laughable NES hardware was, even for it's own time. It's not much of an achievement to make a big jump from that |
It wasn't a cheap shot. It was pointing out that you quite literally didn't know what you were talking about when responding.
Also no... the NES wasn't laughable for it's own time... at least not any more laughable then any modern console has been vs PC.
Impressivness of number goes down as ram goes up. That's pretty obvious because that's how it works for pretty much everything.
It's pretty obvious based on the difference if you switched increases. An increase like the NES to SNES would mean NOTHING to the PS4 from the PS3... yet was a HUGE deal between the NES and SNES. It doesn't take knowledge of english to understand the concept. (or understand 16X which is numerical, not linguistic)
Hence why ethomaz used a times measure in the first place. Cause a pure rank number is meaningless.... as it was. NES to SNES. Or probably more likely Master Systte to SNES was more impressive.
Since it was more powerful then NES. Really depends how you want to define jump between generations though, by company or by just generation.
