Kangi said:
Player1x3 said:
"Absolutely. Homosexuality is a sickness/disorder/sexual malfunction,"
No.
Great argument.
"and it should be treated as such in biology."
No. Wanna know why it isn't treated as such? Because homosexuality has been proven not to be any of those things. Logic!
I think Michael covered this up multiple times already
"It serves no sexual nor procreational purpose to human species"
Neither does casual sex, by that logic.
Uh...ok? Heterosexual sex still has the potential and the ability to reproduce , homosexual doesn't either way. And that was my point
"except for spreading AIDS and other numerous STDs..."
Straight people have STDs too, y'know. But people like having sex, including gay people. Some of those people don't use condoms. What can ya do?
Except gay people (gay men, more specifically) are million times more likely to have it in comparison to straight couples. Gay sex is generally more unsafe.
"So yeah, we should definitely look for a cure to fix."
Scientists have looked for far longer than they should have. Guess what's been found? That sexuality is a function of your brain that you're born with which determines who you're romantically/sexually attracted to and cannot possibly be changed through any modern means.
I don't think they should give up, especially since this issue effects alot of people
"I am also pretty sure lots of gay people would much rather be heterosexual than gay, if they had a choice."
Sure, but just to avoid discrimination. I'd think most people would, for functional purposes, prefer to be bisexual, assuming one could actually change their sexuality. Doubles the pool of potential mates.
I don't know any straight dudes who think ''hmm, i'd like to be attracted to men as well''
|
