By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Michael-5 said:

 

NintendoPie said:

I agree with you on that. But if the option is available then someone somewhere is bound to abuse it.

I agree with you, lol. You are a logical thinker.

Now this brings the question, which is worse? A community without a cure for homosexuality, which oppresses ALL of the homosexuals who wish to live heterosexual lifestlyes, or a community with a cure, which oppresses SOME homosexuals into "cure" themselves?

 

I know in Canada, we would never resort to the second option, but I bet in the Middle East, this would be an immediate law.

A community that doesn't care about the other person's sexuality would be perfect. But we all know that won't happen.

That's a difficult decision though... I would go with the bolded.