techhunter80 said:
I wouldn't consider it an illness of any kind, to me it just what they're attracted to. Like if a guy was into older women, or how someone can be attracted to someone of a different race. It's not wrong it's just a opinion on what they're sexulity attracted to. So there's nothing wrong with it at all. |
Well, my opinion on homosexuality differs from yours. I don't think homosexuality is a matter of preference (like likeing Black guys, or older women), I think it's much deeper. If it was a matter of preference, then I think two things. 1. There is no homosexual, only a bisexual because preference is, as stated, a preference, not a limitation. 2. People's preferences change (you can be into older women for a while, have a bad relationship, and then be into women you age, etc), so homosexuals should easily be able to become heterosexuals if they chose too. However this isn't the case.
NintendoPie said:
I agree with you on that. But if the option is available then someone somewhere is bound to abuse it. |
I agree with you, lol. You are a logical thinker.
Now this brings the question, which is worse? A community without a cure for homosexuality, which oppresses ALL of the homosexuals who wish to live heterosexual lifestlyes, or a community with a cure, which oppresses SOME homosexuals into "cure" themselves?
I know in Canada, we would never resort to the second option, but I bet in the Middle East, this would be an immediate law.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results