CGI-Quality said:
YukanaSenix said:
CGI-Quality said:
So in other words, the best place to buy this is on PC. Got it 
In all seriousness, good to see the next gen version taking advantage of higher resolutions. Now it would be nice to see it in 1080p.
|
Who cares?
A 10+ year old Engine will look bad no matter on what Platform.
It will never reach the beauty of Battlefield 3 PC Ultra Settings no matter what.
Its sad people even discuss about the graphics of CoD cause they are only comparable to early PS2 Games....
Oooooh 60 fps - Super Mario Land runs on 2378962389 FPS on a PC Emulator but i don't see news about that.It isn't hard to get a 10+ year old Game running on much stronger hardware.
Its probably even worse they can't get the PS360 versions running in 60fps and 1080p cause its nothing more than a HD Remake if you think about it.
There was,is and will never be any work and effort behind a CoD Game - Small maps and new weapon models don't justify the price.
Since MW1 they could have added every CoD as a 10$ Patch and this is a fact! - Otherwise every BF3 Mappack should cost 500$ cause 1 Map is bigger and more beautiful than all CoD Maps combined(you probably could really fit every CoD map in one BF3 Map lol)
|
Not sure why you posted all of that, but OK. Some information is better than nothing.....I suppose.
|
Ignore the angry PC Elitist.
