noname2200 said:
xLeftyx said:
noname2200 said:
xLeftyx said:
Critics' analysis can easily be deflated by, hmm, let's see... actually developing more and NEW IPs other than their flagship mascots or the Wii series. |
If I can list some new IPs other than their flagship mascots or the Wii series that they've published over the past couple of years, will you admit that you spoke out of ignorance and that your opinion is therefore completely invalid?
|
Really, I can wiki it myself but I'm actually referring more to Nintendo-developed games but for the sake of argument please do. While you're at it, gauge and list how much production value Nintendo has put in it and how have they conveyed the importance of these IPs in the form of advertisement the same way they do with their flagship titles.
|
But I'm not here to argue, because when a statement is definitively false (and could be disproven with a quick google search, but thank you for admitting that you're actively avoiding becoming informed before making a statement), an argument simply isn't possible. I'm inclined to believe then that you won't admit that you're ignorant on the matter, and that your opinion isn't worth the electricity it took to post it.
|
Argument aside, my opinion still stands that Nintendo mainly puts in so much production value in the same IPs (Mario mainly). I have a post above my reply to you
