By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I got 128 but I'm not sure of the validity of the test as far as measuring intelligence is concerned since it's based solely on geometrical and spatial awareness. I don't think I've read a book since The Bell Curve on which only one type of intelligence is acknowledged, even though that's the kind of science that would appeal to the methodical thinking important academics usually thrive on.

Besides the test is full of flaws: dubious logic in the answers, it's incapable to go beyond 40% deviation etc. That's far from the real deal a mensa test is, for instance.

Of course I also mention it because I scored way higher when I was a kid and refuse to believe I got dumber in time :P