By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:
brendude13 said:

Don't worry, I didn't mean it seriously.

It's just there are so many games, both exclusive and multiplatform, that never find their way to PC and usually end up being crowned game of the year. AAA PC exclusives are very rare these days, I don't see how people can justify throwing them all away for 1080p graphics.

I still prefer to play on consoles with or without the games too, I would rather sit at a distance and play it on a big TV, consoles ensure that the games are also optimised, consistent and run equally for everyone. The other guy mentioned performance, I prefer locked 30fps to 40-50fps, my HD 5770 can run Crysis but it can't run most games at 60fps for some irritating reason, it always sits at 40-50fps, the erratic performance is more distracting than locked 30fps. Battlefield Bad Company always says it is running at 45fps but for some reason it looks like 20fps.

So yeah, that wasn't a dig at PC gaming, it's just my history with PC gaming isn't very good at all.

You can lock your fps in most games by digging into the config file. Also, it's not ensured that you're getting an "optimized" version when you buy console versions of games. Examples: Black Ops (PS3), Bayonetta (PS3), FFXIII (360) etc. It's all much more customizable with PC's but I can see why someone would like the simplicity of consoles. PC exclusives are also probably more numerous these days than one might think.

I swear I've got OCD, so yes, simplicity is what I need.