that entire.....ENTIRE..... from start to finish article was NOTHING but speculation which is what being an analysis is about, educated specuation, but specualtion non the less, and when speculation presented as fact with then becomes bullshit, and gizmodo is and expert??? fucking news to me
Gizmodo is a person? I believe you mean me. Expert is a stretch, but I know what I am talking about for certain. For the purposes of this internet debate I could be considered one, and could easily explain what that number represents in a different topic. I certainly am expert material on certain apsects of this incident, and can speak to the whole process including how it is going to play out. Also, speculation is not the right word. The accuracy is there for what they speak to. Their analysis is 100% correct in context.