| The_vagabond7 said: I don't think my beliefs are the best, I think they are the best that I am aware of. Which is simply logical, if I was aware of a better set of beliefs I would adopt those. Which is why I try to read, study and learn as much as possible. I don't believe the same things today that I did a year ago, and certainly not ten years ago. And I hope that in ten years my beliefs will be superior to the ones I have now.
One shouldn't insist that one's beliefs are the best, they should insist on testing their beliefs against those around them, and those that came before them. If your belief is found to stand on better reason, logic and data then move on and find one that has better reason, logic and data, adopt that and keep going. It's the evolution of ideas, where the strong conquer the weak, and the information age is rapidly speeding this process up. |
I wonder if this is so.
There is evidence to the contrary as well, as the information age allows all ideas to be found on the interent, including people who agree with you. There is some evidence to suggest the internet is also allowing minor viewpoints to continue because it allows singular entities who would be forced to defend their ideas vs others to find others that agree with them whether there ideas are right or not.
While the numbers of supporters may be low in percentage terms of the population... the pure number is unimportant
Research tends to show the internet is more ideologically seregated then everything excpet Newspapers.
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/jesse.shapiro/research/echo_chambers.pdf
So it may not be a problem....
However, what may be flawed and make the data even higher is they are basically only counting major sites.
It also doesn't count the outright extremism you can find on the internet.
Your average person likely couldn't find any KKK literature or Jihadist literature on the streets. Yet on the internet, anyone with google can find any number of hateful things as it costs almost nothing to make a website or message board.
Every viewpoint imaginable has a presense on the internet, where only the most mainstream views have "traditional" media exposure.
Well outside the occasional badly photocopied 2 page newspaper.
I mean, would stuff like Zeitgeist or a lot of this other conspiracy exist without the internet? Sure there were stupid conspiracy theories before, but they were more limited in number.
Now a days it seems like there is a conspiracy for EVERYTHING.
