zgamer5 said:
Chroniczaaa said:
ethomaz said:
AppleHater said:
It started with Reach. All gaming sites started to review games harshly starting with Reach not GT5. Fable 3 and Fallout new vegas all got low review scores and they came out before GT5.
I dont know why you ps3 fanboys think IGN has some sort of vendetta agianst ps3 and its games ? Maybe you should stop and realize that maybe the games got the score they so rightfully deserve? Because honestly Killzone 3 and GT5 were failures ( please dont result in a ban for saying the truth).
They got the reviews they deserve and their meta scores are basically the exact same thing as IGN scores so IGN is not agianst you guys.
|
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL... kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.
That's so funny.
1) IGN down your score system after GT5... all games (not just PS3) are receiving lower scores.
2) IGN has nothing against PS3... just lowered your score.
3) GT5 failure? LOL explain that for over 6 million satisfied users.
4) KZ3 failure? LOL one of the best multiplayer this gen.
LOL LOL LOL
|
Ill just support him for the heck of it... After I got to level 30 in GT5 the game downright sucked balls after that and wasn't really that fun in the first place come to think of it. Then I sold it to amazon for $37.50 as a simulator (sort of) it was good. As a game thats supposed to be fun to play it was bad.
So not all of those 6 million people who bought it enjoyed it. Ever heard of a trade-in?
|
gt5 is a great game. i do agree that it has lots of grinding, but thats just if you want to collect cars you can go threw the game with a lot less grinding if you just buy the cars you need to win races.
gt5 is fun to play for a car lover, looks like your not such a big one.
|
It was a great game for a car lover. especially since you couldn't change the gear ratios on your cars UNTIL an update. I wanted to experience the 24hour la sarthe and 24 hour nurburgring but nooooo i have to grind for about 400 hours of my life to actually get to those races, fuck that.
