By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AussieGecko said:
mantlepiecek said:


You are just stressing how poor the brand did, not doing. Its doing very well right now. When this gen ends PS3 will most likely have profited from this gen (Sony expects it to, anyway) and that will undo the "biggest financial failure of gaming history".

Just because Federer used to be 1st, and is now under Nadal doesn't make him a loser. Just saying


Ooooh I love tennis analogies, I mean look at Anna Kournikova.. she was a good player and stuff. Lleyton Hewitt he was number one. he isn't first class anymore but he was number 1. Nadal is performing better, in tennis if you are in the top 10 you are still extremely incredible as the basis isnt out of 10. 

If a console is top 3... of home consoles... that could mean first or last. 

Stop looking at the past mantlepiecek its moved on haha

Well, the PS3 still isn't a loser because this gen is hardly over. Once its over, you can call it a loser.

Its like deciding who won an F1 race which isn't even complete. Its not possible.

Speaking of F1, Michael Schumacher is another example ;-P