"If you want the game, buy XXX console for it."
That phrase bothers me to no end. Things don't just work out that simply. Some people may just feel that a title would work best on a specific console, whether it is due to graphical output, sales potential, or control usage. Others just do not wanna buy another console.
If they put RE6 on the N-Gage, I know for damn sure I'd at least ask where the PSP port is at. In this case, there is no valid reason why RE6 should be exclusive if it can be effectively done on another console as well.
Soul Calibur CAN WORK on a Nintendo console when done in standard fashion. SoulCalibur Legends was not created in standard fashion, nor was Castlevania Judgment. Both games perverted what each IP was generally known for, and had poor execution on top of it.
Everyone chooses to ignore the elephant in the room (SSBB). Tatsunoko vs Capcom sold 500,000, more than the PS2 & Xbox Marvel vs. Capcom 2 games combined. DBZ: BT3 sold 900k , and so did Naruto. These 2 games are licensed, but the benefit of the history behind the SC series would provide the same sales benefit; its a proven brand.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
