| numonex said: To anyone who claims to be a denier/skeptic of climate change. Are you a journalist paid by Rupert Murdoch News Ltd? Maybe you work on a local news channel or paid to write far-right wing articles to please your conservative like minded readers. Say no if you do not want to know is the Fox News motto. Fair and balanced news is the Fox News motto. ;))) The believers can afford to be wrong on this issue. The climate change skeptic/deniers can not afford to be wrong on this issue. Why am I against nuclear power- the road is always to a path of high enriched uranium to mass produce nuclear weapons. A rogue terrorist nation like Iran should never have access to nuclear power because the road will lead to nuclear weapons which require enrichment of uranium of 95% . There is a huge issue with nuclear waste disposal and the safe disposal of it in the long term. You can not safely dump nuclear toxic waste into landfill for extended periods of time and you can not dump it into oceans/seas/lakes without adverse side effects. The cost of setting up nuclear plants and safely maintaining them is extremely expensive- multiplier effect based on more plants. Cost savings and cutting corners on safety and maintenance on nuclear plants may lead to Chernobyl meltdowns. Multi-national companies like to save costs and cut corners on safety and maintenance and not conducting audits. |
Can they?
What happens if global cliamate change ISN'T man made.
Then all of the attempts to cut carbon emmissions and everything else is wasted because the truth is... the planet itself puts WAAAAAAAAAAY more greenhouse gases in the air then we could ever hope to.
Then with all of our focus on trying to stop our carbon, we've ignored all the other carbon in our hubris of "Something is happening so it HAS to be man."
Global climate change despite 100% of th efforst going through marches on, and most people die. Just as if we woulda did nothing. Except before everyone dies they had less fun.
Gee, too bad rather then trying to use it for political gain, the governmetns of the world didn't invest in Geoengineering.
Then we'd of been able to prevent this disaster. In fact we'd be able to prevent EVERY disaster involved in global warming, both natural and man made.
There is a LOT of promising Geo-engineering out there, but it's underfunded and demonized simply because it doesn't fit the political agenda of those who have hijacked global warming.
Even though it's a BETTER solution.
