I played Halo Reach for some time now. Reviews are broken.

[Reasonable]

yo_john117 said:

libellule said:

"""Halo 3 got a 94 on meta. How can Halo Reach score lower according to different reviewers when it brings more than Halo 3?"""

==> because Halo 3 was OVERrated

Time for you to make another thread about Halo3 review score being unfair ... Oh, wait, I suppose this was not a problem to you ...

/thread

Nope your flat out wrong....all you have to do is actually play it to figure that out.

OT: I completely agree, I think tons of reviewers are rating it low just to get hits (cause they know an absolute TON of Haters and hardcore fans alike are gonna look at the reviews)

Surely if "tons" of reviewers were rating it low it would have a lower Metascore?  What do you mean by low?  The lowest I've seen is 4 out of 5 stars, which is hardly low as I define it.  Sure, on metacritic that becomes 80 out of 100, but that's metacritic's fault and simply shows some of the issues with their approach.

I mean, are there any 6/10 or such reviews?  I haven't seen any - I mean proper reviews not some blog wirtten by a PS3 (or Wii to be politically correct) fan.