| scottie said: I think if you're complaining because one game got 93 and another got 94 then you probably have too much time on your hands :P
Anyway, if you read the reviews instead of just having the combination of 34 * approx 1000 words sumarised into a single number, you will see that the main complaints with the game are
Short single player (6 hours is how long they said it took to finish it) "paper thin plot" Very little innovation from previous Halo games
Now, this is why reviews include words as well as a big ol' number. Obviously, if you care not for long lasting single player, or are buying the game mostly for multiplayer anyway, and especially if you really loved Halo and don't want them to wreck the series by moving too far from its roots, then obviously the 80 isn't going to be aimed at you.
Edit - fixed a typo |
Your a troll*I'll take the 2week ban..seeing Im more or less swamped at work*
1) Mw2 and 1...2-4hrs on hardest setting...(infact beat mw2 3hrs...and was like..thats it at the end....8(*
2) After how many stis*mister 1k words..if you took the time to read ign others said 9hrs on hard.....which btw who the fug plays Halo on anything less than mufo heroic!*
3) ''Paper thin plot" compared to what? Oblivion..yaya..I close X gate 99 times...I beat game at lvl 1 but sit on a meta of 93 ...oh you mean compared to gta4??...shit...You ever seen Master fug'n chief use a Cell phone...?...dude I have more to do than run around in something I painted in water colors and soory adult friend finder is a much more engorssing dating sim than taking my fat friend to shot darts.
4) K rant over.
5) Fug no it's not.
You think folks Play killzone2*which is a great game but I liked KZ1 better gameplay wise* or folks that bought MW1/2 jumped at it for the "single player"....?
Back out the thread...
You reek troll..and as such..your comment has no merit.
Excuse the typo's etc...cell phone typing isnt my mad skillz...
