I don't think I can easily agree with anything that the article points out.
Technical. No not really. Yes it's MORE POWERFUL and I'm more than happy to agree with that, but how does that lead anything outside the standard game of leapfrogging. It's not leading it's following the standard path. XBox live only brought a gimped version of PC online style. Considering that the PS3 is practically following the Wii in terms of direction how can PS3 be leading anything.
Most of the games listed haven't broken anything nor really brought much new to the table. Games were ground breaking from PS1 to PS2 and the jump was certainly similar.
What Sony brought to this gen was the same but improved tech of last gen. Nintendo brought tech that wasn't in the generation before. If we are talking about technically speaking then Nintendo is leading the way on tech. If you want to refer to raw power then Sony has managed to come from behind for once and take the lead. When people say Technical they refer to prowess not brute force.
What I will give is that ALL developers should be given due respect. Even if a game turns out bad the effort and amount of work is considerable and nobody likes their work bashed by a bunch of tards who wank off to stupid stuff. Kudos to Sony and all the other developers who work hard to give us a rich gaming experience.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
