Squilliam said:
.jayderyu said:
I think? I think it's about right for early adopter tech. Let's consider how long it's taken to adopt HD TV. I bet anything that it's adoption rate will be slower. I also bet glasses based 3D TV will be dead at the point when it would make serious market penetration in favour of new glassless tech. Then REAL adoption of 3D will begin.
There was a medium before DVD. used similar tech, but the discs were the size of an old record style. these were Laserdiscs. It was great tech and beat DVD to the market, but the size was inconvenient. Tape cassettes beat out records because of convenience. CD beat out Records because of convience. Technology MUST be convenient for it to be acceptably adopted as part of your living life style. 3D glasses work for movies because movies are not part of your normal living lifestyle.
I think finally. These TV producers are going to spend to much money in the wrong direction for 3D TV. Much like the other media format Laserdisc. Just remember even even early adopters bought laser disc. Early adopters buy any new technology just for the sake of the technology. It's the masses that buy tech for convenience.
|
Yay! Now I don't have to make a logical and well thought out post! Woooooot!
In any case in the short term I expect the passive glasses to win out over the active glasses because they are easier to wear, cheap and don't run out of batteries at the absolute wrong moment, especially in sizes above 40" because its easier to fit in the required pixel density if you do line by line polarisation.
|
active galsses and passive glasses? ok i'm lost on this 3d tech apparantly. I know of the red/blue glasses, and i know fo the glasses given at 3d movies in theatres.
there is more? there are glasses i need to put BATTERIES in? Wow I thought i was turned off 3D before, but screw batteries.
