Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
You used sleight of hand to dig at Sony and make the point that this diminished how effective their E3 would be, which is patently ludicrous to one not of your predisposition. It was childish, or should I use the term trolling? So I wasn't out to contradict you, you see, except to say that you overstated how much this "harmed Sony's E3" or whatever, which is tenuous at best and which you pulled out of thin air even though what news means to most people is simply that there is one more non-confirmatory bit of evidence that a new game from a series they like (TM) is indeed in production.
|
You must be joking. I pointed out the fact that surprises at E3 are better than not surprises when it comes to the way we gamers "keep score." Suddenly I'm trolling? Read my original post. It's very much on point and on topic, and had no implication of a dig towards sony besides stating the opinion that this costs them a point for their E3 press conference(which you can take to mean what you will, but it certainly doesn't cost them nothing, or the internet wouldn't care). You simply saw my name, and read a bunch of shit into it that wasn't there, because you are biased and defensive.
I don't know if I "overstated" the situation. I think that my analogy is pretty valid. This is a "surprise" that won't happen at E3 because it happened at the bonus round. It's not a big surprise, certainly, but it's of note, and I'll be goddamned if I'm going to be bullied out of mentioning this kind of stuff because it makes people like you angry when it's said aloud. Get over it, and stop trying to claim ToS violations like "trolling" if you don't know what the hell it means.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.