mysticwolf said:
FF_Fanatic said:
Carl2291 said:
mysticwolf said:
Carl2291 said:
mysticwolf said:
That is the answer to the question of the title of this thread
|
So. Let me get this right. Some Nintendo fans are angry because...
Sony's remote is black, while the Wii's is white.
Sony's has a wireless sub-controller, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's has a big coloured ball on the end, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's uses a camera to work, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's is more accurate than the Wii's.
Sony's cannot be tilted to be used like a traditional controller, the Wii's can.
OT:
I think it's more to do with the more hardcore Wii fanbase being worried of 3rd parties reaction to it. If it sells well enough, we could see 3rd parties show even less attention to the Wii. ESPECIALLY if Natal takes off too. I predict lots of butthurt talk after E3, if Natal is looking good...
|
Looks don't matter. It's the same thing, it just looks different.
Nintendo could've made the Nunchuck wireless if they wanted too, but they didn't.
Of course Move will be more accurate! Technology always gets better as time goes on.
If Nintendo wanted to make entirely new and more accurate controllers, they could. But instead of making customers buy entirely new controllers, they made Motion+
|
If looks don't matter than why did you post a pointless picture showing how the 2 controllers look?
|
ignore them they are all butt hurt because the wiimote is not as good as ps move, as it has augmented reality and it can also do some things that natal can do like body tracking, notice how no-one is attacking natal, it looks like ps move may well be more succesful then we all think and the ninty fans now that which is why they keep on attacking it.
not to mention it already has better games for it, even though wm+ has been around for a while and all they got was wii sports resort that was worth getting i mean all that for a £40 add on i would be pissed off as well, which is why i did not bother with wm+ and will just get ps move instead
|
Excuse me, but I'm pretty sure Sony hasn't released Move yet, so who are you to say that Move is better than the Wii? Yes, you've seen commercials, interviews, etc..., but those things only show the positive aspects of the product. It's like an advertisement. You don't know everything you're getting until you actually get it. You can't say that Move is better than Wii because Move hasn't been released yet, you don't know how successful it's going to be, and you don't know how well it's going to work. Yes, the Wii seemed amazing, but it didn't live up to my full expectations, but that's because my expectations were raised by all the hype, the commercials, and everything else. But the Wii still is amazing, don't get me wrong, it's just that sometimes people think something "sucks" because they had their expectations too high.
|
you know what irritates me is the fact that none of the people hating on move have done thier research properly, i mean ps move copied wii games come on eye toy play sports came out on playstation eye, and video's exist of the ps move developers exploring the concept of using a wand dating back all the way to 2004 which was before wiimote even existed, which is why sony fans get mad on ninty fans for hating ps move, and if it's not going to be a big sucess (don't care for the big official thread) then how come this stupid thread has lasted for so long with lots of arguments from both sides.
trouble is i have seen lots of public showings of move and everyone always comes back positive from them saying it's like the wiimote(with wm+) but better and ps gives the better gfx as well, it's just so much more interesting sorry, also ps move has natal capabilities thanks to the camera, can wiimote do that - no so it's not a copy!!!
