By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nen-suer said:
andremop said:
nen-suer said:
andremop said:
The fact that sony had to sacrifice everything to make the PS3 a respectable 3rd place (300 dollars price cut- never in the history of videogames that happened) shows how their strategy failed.

And that comment (Skeeuk's) about it being a better console with better games - stupid as ever.

Maybe because a 600$ price tag never happened in the history of VG

you speak as if its the cheapest console on the market O_0

it's not my fault they priced it like that... like I said, its their strategy's fault.

After that they indeed had to sacrifice everything to make the PS3 live, for it to become a respectable (I mean it - very respectable) 3rd place.

And $600 price tag happened before, lol! The 3DO!

PS3 lived thankx to its games (you know the thing that really matters)

No, it lived because its price cuts and brand name (you know, things that matter too). Now it's living because its games and brand name (but will need price cuts too!).

But every single plattform has games  - and great games (the ones that matter), you're in denial if you can't see that.