bowspearer on 27 April 2010
| cmeese47 said: The genuine concerns of others was voided when they agreed to the EULA. Sony had clear permission to remove said feature regardless if there reason had merit or not. |
Ok if you're saying this then you clearly don't understand how contract law works. To begin with any contract which breaches a country's laws is legally null and void. The company can swear blind that their actions are legal, but it's about as credible a stance as a serial killer claiming their homocides are legal. Furthermore under contract law, if duress can be proved, and in this case there is a clear case of it (not to mention that the "choice" breaches consumer protection laws whichever way you look at it) and so once again, their contract here is legally null and void.
If you're going to try and use EULAs and T&Cs to argue a case, you need to understand just what scope they have in regards to the law.
