chaospluto said:
milkyjoe said:
chaospluto said:
milkyjoe said:
chaospluto said:
HappySqurriel said:
chaospluto said:
Possibly HD, but then they would be hypocritical. Though what company ISNT!?
|
In what way would that be hypocritical?
|
"When asked about display technology like HD and 3-D, Fils-Aime downplayed them as a necessity. “When people talk about high definition for the Wii console, our feedback is that that by itself will not create a brand new experience. Therefore, we're not interested. What we have to push for are groundbreaking new experiences. Technology has to enable it, not to be a means all by itself.”"http://www.industrygamers.com/news/nintendo-not-interested-in-wii-hd-says-reggie/ |
All he's saying in that interview and every other one of the 5,000 Wii HD interviews is that HD is not enough of a reason on its own to release a new console. He's not saying they aren't interested in HD.
|
How much clearer can I make it >_<.
|
Read the entire quote rather than cherry-picking four words... If you don't get it then, then all I have for you is pity.
|
I've already read it, I know what I read. It still says they're not interested in it, regardless of how you read it. They need a reason to go HD and they haven't got the reason yet. Which still means they're not interested.
|
well obviously, if they were to release a wii HD that would mean they had found the reason that you mention.... so there wouldn't be any hypocrisy, just the exact evolution they said they would do.
