By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
Demotruk said:
Carl2291 said:

2 year late ports, yes. But the highest quality games of there genre also.

Unarcadey rail shooters? Call of Duty... "Unarcedey rail shooter"? And you think you deserve these games?

I thought you were referring to the other Resident Evil games, I made a mistake. One that was of little consequence but you capitalized on it for a bit of ad hominem anyway.

Do you think the Wii Call of Duty's (forgetting 3 since it sucked generally, it's not like it sold great on PS3) compare in the sort of effort or even features that were put into the HD versions? One of them is a gimped port, the other is a two year late gimped port. Even if it weren't gimped, the game was designed to be played on the HD consoles and suffers on Wii for it.

It's not possible to give them the features that were on the HD versions. We both know this. As for effort, the game was good enough... It's better than The Conduit, which was a hyped up exclusive.

The COD games on the Wii are not better than the Conduit, and I don't understand why people keep saying this. They sell more because they are an estbalished name.

The effort was "good enough"? So having a very small team rushing a port of COD4 in 6-8 months is enough effort? You're unintentionally saying that the Wii isn't worth putting any real effort into.