Here is why PS3 games have higher accumulated review average than 360 games

[disolitude]

SickleSigh said:

disolitude said:

deathbleachnarutodbz said:
maybe people just make better games for the ps3.

I don't want to get in to the details on how it costs more money to make a PS3 game...and that generally it has lower game sales than 360 due to lower userbase (with exceptions ofcourse)...and that its much more complex to develo for PS3, which is something that devs of shitty games like this cant be bothered with.

So Ill just say...metacritic does not back your statement above.

Disolitude is a very level headed xbox fan =P he brings up a point which I thought everyone knew. With xbox having a larger library I would think it would be harder to get the median score high. Ps3 is hard to develop for and I think even Kaz said they did it on purpose to avoid shovelware (which I admit was Sony spin) but it's true to some degree. Less games overall get made for Ps3 but less bad games in general since they can't risk it.

Especially now that MS lifted the 720P AA rule and games can be SD. 2010 will be the year of lowest overall quality for the 360 for sure.

CAn you imagine a 480p game on the 360 and the thrashing it will get form reviewers