By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
naznatips said:

Sorry about the 28 year ban. That's my fault. I was trying to figure out why he was still able to post despite the ban and entered 9999 days as a test. Obviously that in no way corrects the issue with banning not stopping posting. I'm trying to readjust it back to the original 3 months and ioi can deal with any extensions or removals.

As far as your complaints Crucial, sorry I really can't address them because I'm not the one who made the decision to ban you. I think you would have done a better job of making your point if you had been more respectful and less insulting. It also would have helped to address complaints to ioi directly rather than to just attack the site as a whole.

You also have to understand that once your complaint has been addressed (whether your opinion is rejected or accepted) you need to drop it. There is never an excuse for spamming.


QFT.  Crucial's complaints showed no respect for anyone involved with the site.  His sarcastic tone and frequent use of insults really hurt his overall argument by making it less credible.  You don't need insults to make a point.  In fact, you're hurting your overall message by using them.  What you're trying to say instantly becomes less credible.  I agree with a ban (albeit, not the length) as Crucial showed little respect for the people allowing such a wonderful site to exist.  I think Final-Fan is overreacting a bit to this.  It wasn't the great argument Final-Fan made it out to be.  It was full of insults and devoid of respect, the opposite of what you want in an argument.