By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tallgeese101 said:
Esmoreit said:
The one argument I never get is the "PS3 has more room to cut price". Why is this? Because they are the least close to the $0? Room here is dependent not just on absolutes mate. I'd say giving financial resources the PS3 has the least room to cut the price.

Eventually the cost of making the PS3 will be comparable to how much the PS2 costs to make today.  The real question is will it still be relevent when it can be sold at a low price.

That is what I mean and should have included. True, 25 years from now you can probably pick up PS3-like technology for $10
or so but, des it still matter then?

This is also how the "Ten-year-plan" is biting Sony. Making it future proof left virtually no wiggle-room during the years that it matters. PS2 technology could take price drops more easily then the PS3 technology can. It took PS2 about 8 years to drop to $100 where it started at... 400 I believe? If sony keeps it losses respectable it should take the PS3 a lot more years to reach that $100 price tag.



The Doctor will see you now  Promoting Lesbianism -->