Gnizmo on 13 May 2009
| CHYUII said: Evolution is a philosophy because scientific method can never be applied to it. We have no way of researching it, because we have no way of reproducing the moments in which life was created on Earth. If it is a fact then scientist would not still call it a theory. Statistically speaking it is very improbable that random chance gave rise to order (not to mention it is against the PROVEN Laws of Science). Darwin said that if it could be proven that life forms did not become more complicated over a series of successive improvements, then his theory would be proven wrong. Micheal Denton an atheist wrote a book called evolution: a theory in Crisis, He spent the first part of the book ripping religion. And then went on to make his case- And he is not alone in those beliefs other scientist believe the same. I am not anti- science but I am Anti- Dogma and the theory of Evo. is sometimes just that. I believe in Micro but not Macro. The rest is more in line with Intelligent Design because Intelligent Design is more inline with the ACTUAL LAWS of SCIENCE. But this is a free country and I do not mean to step on anothers beliefs, we are free to worship as we choose... |
Ok you are wrong on two major points here. First of all evolution is not a fact because theories are built upon facts. In the world of science there is nothing more important or more true than a theory. There are very few "laws" in science because we are very, very often wrong. Simply put there is no higher form of knowledge than a theory in modern day science. You will notice gravity is simply a theory.
Secondly evolution has been demonstrated. Not only can we see it actively in bacteria (antibiotics) but also in various experiments with fruit flies. We have little hard evidence for huge changes, but those would take some time to build up a case for or against anyways.
