Rpruett said:
Oh I see your opinion and I understand it. Everyone has different gaming tastes ya know? I guess I feel like, yeah Mario is a good game. (Almost every Mario I have ever played is fun). I just don't think Galaxy differentiates itself enough to impress me. I mean Mario 64 is now over 10 years in the rear view mirror and I feel like when playing Galaxy that there is very little different from Galaxy / Mario 64 with the occasional usage of the Wii-mote and running on planets.
I think MGS4 is a conclusion to a game for the fans. It's always been a series with a lot of cutscenes or codec conversations interrupting the gameplay. The gameplay by itself is somewhat shallow IMO (But the games success has been it's uniqueness and how it could immerse you into the story of the game). The plots are no more confusing IMO than any of the other MGS games in the series and while I'm sure you could poke holes in it's logic in several places, Overall (Especially if you read up on the included Game Database) you can put a lot of things together.
I think the problem with this argument is MGS4 will not be appealing to many people because it assumes you've played other Metal Gear Sold games to some extent and actually enjoy the gameplay. It just seems to me a lot of people either never played the other Metal Gear Solid games (Or particularly enjoyed them) but expected to enjoy the 4th one.
|
Yeah, it's like looking at OoT against TP, I think they are both about on par but some people hate TP despite how much better it controled with the Wiimote lol.
Personally, I liked the other MGS better than the 4th one, a lot of the times, I wanted to choke people with 4, if I didn't have all the beauty to look at, I think I'd gone insane already. It's a good thing he ended the Solid one, I guarantee it would have gone down hill from there if he didn't end it.