By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shock182 said:
CGI-Quality said:
@ d21

I agree with you almost fully. The area we differ is with KZ2. Trust me, that demo does NO justice for the full game. Towards the end especially, is some of the greatest artwork I've EVER witnessed.

That said, I agree with the majority, the PS3 will probably stay ahead (graphically). It just won't destroy the 360, but it's games do/will look noticeably better.

My $0.02 :)

 

 That is more or less my point with noticeably being the key word.

To some noticeably = OMGZERS 360 looks last gen

To others noticeably = well yeah, maybe this game does look a tiny bit better, can't really tell though.

Truth = it all depends on the game and the person.

The point is that we've reached diminishing returns in graphics. And not just about PS3 vs 360.

Even the most powerful graphical beast of a game (Crysis) won't look noticeably better to an untrained eye than the best looking ps360 games. My gf is more likely to appreciate the fact that it renders well beaches and luscious vegetation than if it employs object-based motion blur or HDR/iris effects.

The nitpicking is for us game geeks, exactly like dissecting each film scene composition and lighting is for movie buffs and students. Thus when we say "noticeably" we mean for us, though the rest of the world lives by different rules.

 



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman