Sometime I wonder what is the point of starting this whole graphics argument thing all over again.
X360 fanboys will never see the difference between killzone2 and whatever x360 game because they are blinded by their fanboyism.
Even MS who makes the console can more or less own up and say "yeah, Killzone2 is graphically better than anything we have done but we can still compete and create similar", but the fanboys still can't, blinded by x360 love.
PS3 fanboys somehow see a huge gap in graphics between K2 and Gears.
IMO Killzone2 is graphically superior to gears and yes I have played both.
To answer your question I call to mind 2 things.
1) The ps3 is suppose to be hard to develop for and the x360 far easier.
2) it came out over a year and months after the x360.
Which do you think have the greater potential to produce better graphics looking forward?
BTW: I AM NOT A FANBOY.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
