Currently Online 
Torillian on 04 February 2009
if you review a port with absolutely no improvements you have two choices, you can base it off of the capabilities at the time, in which case the score would remain what it was, or you could compare it to the capabilities of the console it is being ported to. Obviously they seemed to have gone with the latter and I agree with it. A lazy port should not be rewarded with the same score as the original effort, and if that game came out for the Wii right now, it would probably get a similar score. Perhaps it would be a 2 and they were harsher because of it being a unimproved port, but I don't think the same game now would deserve a 3.
...
