By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZenfoldorVGI said:

Most of this thread is fanboy rubbish, so I'll disregard it for now. Suffice it to say that if the 360 version is inferior in any way, it will most certainly be in the sound department.

That said, the game will likely be identical. There will be disc swaps for the 360 version, however there will also be optional installs/soundtracks, ect. The PS3 will have installs as well, but they won't be optional.

The sound for the 360 version will likely be more compressed, ala 5.1. There will be virtually no difference without a 700 dollar plus 7.1 system backing your play, which virtually no one here has, except for me.

There is no point in arguing over which console the game will play better on. None of you know.

A more interesting topic is as follows:

Would the PS3 have HD pole-position right now if it wasn't for the betreyal?

I certainly would have a PS3 right now, after those trailers.

As for Star Ocean 4, well, I've never had much faith in Tri-Ace. The previous SO games were above average, but we're discussing Final Fantasy here, not some run of the mill RPG. Of course FFXIII will look and actually be better than SO4, ToV, WKC, and Verses. Period. There is no point in discussing that. It's innocent until proven guilty. Until the game proves that it isn't the baddest ass thing since sliced bread, it should be assumed AAA game of the generation, and that's all there is too it.

Now, back to your petty bickering over teh Blu-Reh, and Tri-Ace. Your logic fails you at every turn.

Why would a game released well after FFXIII sharing the same source engine, resources and even programmers be inferior in graphic? Was FF-X2's graphic inferior to FF-X despite it being a spin-off? This is completely illogical, Versus has time, resource AND precedent on its side.