DKII said:
Khuutra said:
Torillian said:
I'll admit I don't really get your third question. |
I apologize, and will do my best to clarify.
What I mean is that we would talk about what a game is about, dissecting it in a way that echoes cinematic and literary criticism. Most video game reviews discuss plot and music and so forth, maybe a charater or two, but they rarely dip into what a game is about on the whole, the subjects that it tackles or the way that it interacts with the player. A critical analysis of Wii Sports would be fascinating and no less deep than a critical analysis of Final Fantasy IV DS or even Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords, but each of them would be very different because each game sets out to and accomplishes very different things.
|
These are consumer reviews, meant to inform people whether or not the game is worth a purchase. Frankly most cinematic/literary criticism doesn't do that job and is just pretentious.
|
Oof. That's an argument for another day... but all right, never mind, then.
I didn't expect something in line with how Ebert reviews movies to be rejected out of hand, though.