Chumly on 02 April 2007
DKII said:
There's no reason for it to include a full week of April (1-7) instead of putting that in the April numbers. The people here are the ones that actually have direct access to the data, I think they know what they're talking about. ;>
Uhh..... The person that gave out the info on neogaf actually gets the report so im gonna trust him.........
Anyways it includes the first week of april due to the extra week from January that it included due to the 7 year cycle or whatever that needs an extra week added in.
Besides I know for a fact that nobody whos responded to this thread actually gets the report so we should all stick with neogaf on this one.
