Alacrist on 27 March 2007
robjoh said:
Alacrist said:
robjoh said:
The funny thing is that they thought that it played better than the ps2 version, but gave it a worse score. Must say that I don't understand much of game journalism.
That doesn't make sense!?!?
Read the review 
"Medal of Honor Vanguard was clearly designed for PlayStation 2 and upgraded for Wii. Games developed in this manner have a tendency to show barely-tweaked visuals and tacked on controls, but Vanguard looks notably sharper and plays significantly better on Nintendo's system. I've scored it lower than our sister site, though, because Wii is simply capable of so much more. Vanguard arrives on PS2 at the end of its life cycle, but it comes to Wii at the beginning and it barely scratches the surface of what's really possible. "
Still, don't make sense, that's just a excuse if you ask me, that's just a reason to give the Wii version a lower score, I've never heard of a game having better graphics and better gameplay elements but still being scored lower that's just dumb. It doesn't matter about the life cycle of the system I bet the PS3 version would have been rated higher than the PS2 version.
"Medal of Honor Vanguard was clearly designed for PlayStation 2 and upgraded for Wii. Games developed in this manner have a tendency to show barely-tweaked visuals and tacked on controls, but Vanguard looks notably sharper and plays significantly better on Nintendo's system. I've scored it lower than our sister site, though, because Wii is simply capable of so much more. Vanguard arrives on PS2 at the end of its life cycle, but it comes to Wii at the beginning and it barely scratches the surface of what's really possible. "
