TheRealMafoo on 21 October 2008
it's funny how people look at the Constitution, and see different things.
When I see it telling the american people that you have the right to weapons for the purpose of uprising against an unjust government, I assume they meant to allow me the tools needed to get the job done.
I don't think they would want me to still have a musket. I think they would want me to have whatever is needed. I don't think nukes are needed, but missiles, tanks, automatic weapons... whatever we would need to replace the government.
The entire point was for government to realize that if they start removing out liberties, there were real consequences. I think it's obvious that today there aren't any.
