By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Quantum Tarantino said: Kwaad said: 2. Have you seen 300? at the movies? The trailer looks better at 1080p than the movie looks at the theater. (this is sheer detail. 1080p has more detail than a film theater) This quote, above all else, CLEARLY shows how clueless you are. Film has a FAR FAR FAR higher resolution than 1080P Film is analog so there are no real "pixels." However, based on converted measures, a 35mm frame has 3 to 12 million pixels, depending on the stock, lens, and shooting conditions. An HD frame has 2 million pixels, measured using 1920 x 1080 scan lines. With this difference, 35mm appears vastly superior to HD
You saying that amuses me. Yes, film is higher quality. However to make it proper focus/display/colors it is hard. http://www.vgcharts.org/forum/thread.php?id=568 Read that thread and what I say. I'm not gonna go into it here. You are barking up the wrong tree. Why is 'digital' movie theaters superior to 'film' movie theaters then? You answer me that, and you'll prove I am right. And if you wanna get real smart. Prove 'film' theaters look worse than 'digital' 1080p is higher quality than a film movie theater.



PSN ID: Kwaad


I fly this flag in victory!